kadircet added a comment. In D128462#3793266 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128462#3793266>, @beanz wrote:
> I think we had no expectation that DXC-mode would be supported by the tooling > APIs at this point. Right, and as I mentioned in my previous comments this is completely fine, at least in the start. because as more and more developers start working with your toolchain, they'll also start using clang-tools and their bugs will be on us, rather than the maintainers of these toolchain/driver modes. which I believe puts the pressure on the wrong end, because we cannot even know what the intended way of handling these flags are, let alone knowing about the details of file discovery etc. that turns out to be a problem if not done properly. My main complaint here's around **breaking** functionality for existing driver-modes/toolchains, and I am asking either getting OWNERS approvals going forward or being more through with the changes or changing the design overall to make these less complicated. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128462/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128462 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
