yusuke-kadowaki added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst:865 + + * ``TCAS_DontAlign`` (in configuration: ``DontAlign``) + Don't align trailing comments. ---------------- HazardyKnusperkeks wrote: > yusuke-kadowaki wrote: > > HazardyKnusperkeks wrote: > > > MyDeveloperDay wrote: > > > > yusuke-kadowaki wrote: > > > > > MyDeveloperDay wrote: > > > > > > Is Don'tAlign the same as Leave that other options support (for > > > > > > options it best if we try and use the same terminiology > > > > > > > > > > > > Always,Never,Leave (if that fits) > > > > > IMHO, `Leave` probably fits but `DontAlign` is more straightforward. > > > > > Also `DontAlign` is used for other alignment styles like > > > > > `BracketAlignmentStyle` so it would be more natural. > > > > Leave should mean do nothing.. I'm personally not a fan of DontAlign > > > > because obvious there should be a ' between the n and the t but I see > > > > we use it elsewhere > > > > > > > > But actually now I see your DontAlign is effectively the as before > > > > (i.e. it will not add extra spaces) > > > > > > > > The point of Leave is what people have been asking for when we > > > > introduce a new option, that is we if possible add an option which > > > > means "Don't touch it at all" i.e. if I want to have > > > > > > > > ``` > > > > int a; // abc > > > > int b; /// bcd > > > > int c; // cde > > > > ``` > > > > > > > > Then so be it > > > > > > > > > > > Leave is a nice option, yes. > > > I think it is complementary to `Dont`. > > > > > > But maybe if the option is called `AlignTrailingComments` one may > > > interpret `Leave` not as "don't touch the position of a comment at all" > > > (what do we do, if the comment is outside of the column limit?), but as > > > "just don't touch them, when they are somewhat aligned". Just a thought. > > > Leave should mean do nothing > > > > Ok now I see what `Leave` means. > > But that should be another piece of work no? > > > > Of course me or someone can add the feature later (I don't really know how > > to implement that though at least for now) > > > > > Fine by me. @HazardyKnusperkeks Is this complicated? If it's not I might as well do this. Also it would be helpful if you could provide some implementation guidance. Sorry to ask this even though I haven't tried it myself yet. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D132131/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D132131 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
