aaron.ballman added a comment. In D133425#3777598 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133425#3777598>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D133425#3775353 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D133425#3775353>, @ldionne wrote: > >> Re-applying `fcd549a7d8284a8e7c763fee3da2206acd8cdc4f` would not require any >> Clang changes. > > I think that would be a good solution if it's workable, at least for the > issue we're seeing internally. It is worth noting that this won't resolve the issue when using libstdc++ and Clang's behavior with this diagnostic differs from GCC's: https://godbolt.org/z/YMznh4Weq Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D133425/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D133425 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
