benlangmuir added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Lex/DependencyDirectivesScanner.h:131 +/// \p dependency_directives_scan::tokens_present_before_eof, otherwise this +/// directive will be ignored. /// ---------------- Why would you want to print without this? It seems important for correctness of the output. I would have expected we would always print it. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/Lex/DependencyDirectivesScanner.cpp:868 + PrintMarkerForTokensBeforeEOF) + OS << "<TokBEOF>"; Optional<tok::TokenKind> PrevTokenKind; ---------------- How about "TokBeforeEOF"? I think "BEOF" is too cryptic. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D133357/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D133357 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits