yusuke-kadowaki marked an inline comment as done. yusuke-kadowaki added a comment.
Can we all agree with the decision whether we use the `AlignConsecutiveStyle` or introduce a new struct before I start implementing or updating the document? IMO, both are reasonable in some respects so I'd like you owners to decide. > Please also mark the comments as done once addressed so we know you’ve read > and fixed our requests I'm reading all the comments but leaving some comments not done on purpose that I think the discussion is not done. Isn't it a right thing to do here? ================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Format/Format.h:298 + /// Style of aligning consecutive trailing comments. + /// This option existed as ``AlignTrailingComments`` since version 3.7. + /// ---------------- MyDeveloperDay wrote: > Isn’t this completely wrong? Could you please be more specific about why you think so when pointing out something? I don't see why you think it's wrong. I also would like to mention that I followed @HazardyKnusperkeks's request on this. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D132131/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D132131 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
