njames93 added a comment.
In D130181#3769083 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130181#3769083>, @JonasToth wrote:
> ...
Your concerns aren't actually that important. Because the transformations only
work on for binary operators, and not CXXOperatorCallExpr, it would always
never do any special logic, instead just wrap the whole thing in parens and
negate it
if (!(A && B))
continue;
if (!(!B && C))
continue;
padLines();
The only potential issue would be cases when the binary operator is type
dependent, as binary operators where they type is unresolved are handled as
BinaryOperators, even if every instantiation would be resolved to an operator
call
template <size_t N, size_t M>
void fancyMatrix(Matrix<N,M> A, Matrix<M, M> B) {
}
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130181/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130181
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
