mizvekov added a comment. In D128113#3753656 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128113#3753656>, @davrec wrote:
> If I'm missing something and it is substantially more complex than that, then > you're right that storing the pack index might end up the best solution - we > don't want to e.g. have to do considerable Sema logic in the Resugarer just > to infer the pack index. Having a new Subst-like node that wraps the whole expanded pattern seems to simplify the case where we need to take the type apart, such as deductions, leaving you without the 'birds-eye' view. Otherwise we would need to dig into the type to figure out what pack indexes we need to preserve in the resulting type. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128113/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128113 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
