usaxena95 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/SemanticSelectionTests.cpp:391
+ /* No folding for this comment.
+ */ int b_token=0;
+ )cpp",
----------------
kadircet wrote:
> it'd be nice to have a test case like:
> ```
> template <[[typename foo, class bar]]> struct baz {[[]]};
> ```
>
> which isn't useful for line-only folding clients, but something we should be
> able to support going forward.
I don't understand. We do not return any single-line ranges.
I think lines are never long enough to have helpful foldings (atleast in
formatted code). It would only clutter IMO.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D131154/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D131154
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
