nickdesaulniers added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:10133-10135
+  if (ImplicitMatch == ArgType::NoMatchPedantic ||
+      ImplicitMatch == ArgType::NoMatchTypeConfusion)
+    Match = ImplicitMatch;
----------------
nickdesaulniers wrote:
> Similarly, if `ImplicitMatch` can only be updated to one of these two values 
> within the above `const ImplicitCastExpr *ICE = 
> dyn_cast<ImplicitCastExpr>(E)` branch, does it make sense to additionally 
> hoist this conditional check into that branch as well?
If we can do both suggestions, then `ImplicitMatch` can remain scoped to that 
branch, as it previously was.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D132568/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D132568

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to