Author: aaronballman
Date: Fri Jul 15 07:55:47 2016
New Revision: 275558
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=275558&view=rev
Log:
Removing a few more :option: tags that we do not have corresponding .. option
directives for; these are causing the sphinx bot to fail
(http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-sphinx-docs/builds/15213/steps/docs-clang-html/logs/stdio).
Modified:
cfe/trunk/docs/UsersManual.rst
Modified: cfe/trunk/docs/UsersManual.rst
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/docs/UsersManual.rst?rev=275558&r1=275557&r2=275558&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/docs/UsersManual.rst (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/docs/UsersManual.rst Fri Jul 15 07:55:47 2016
@@ -543,15 +543,15 @@ vectorize a loop body.
Clang offers a family of flags which the optimizers can use to emit
a diagnostic in three cases:
-1. When the pass makes a transformation (:option:`-Rpass`).
+1. When the pass makes a transformation (`-Rpass`).
-2. When the pass fails to make a transformation (:option:`-Rpass-missed`).
+2. When the pass fails to make a transformation (`-Rpass-missed`).
3. When the pass determines whether or not to make a transformation
- (:option:`-Rpass-analysis`).
+ (`-Rpass-analysis`).
-NOTE: Although the discussion below focuses on :option:`-Rpass`, the exact
-same options apply to :option:`-Rpass-missed` and :option:`-Rpass-analysis`.
+NOTE: Although the discussion below focuses on `-Rpass`, the exact
+same options apply to `-Rpass-missed` and `-Rpass-analysis`.
Since there are dozens of passes inside the compiler, each of these flags
take a regular expression that identifies the name of the pass which should
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ compile the code with:
Note that remarks from the inliner are identified with `[-Rpass=inline]`.
To request a report from every optimization pass, you should use
-:option:`-Rpass=.*` (in fact, you can use any valid POSIX regular
+`-Rpass=.*` (in fact, you can use any valid POSIX regular
expression). However, do not expect a report from every transformation
made by the compiler. Optimization remarks do not really make sense
outside of the major transformations (e.g., inlining, vectorization,
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ Current limitations
2. Some source locations are not displayed correctly. The front end has
a more detailed source location tracking than the locations included
in the debug info (e.g., the front end can locate code inside macro
- expansions). However, the locations used by :option:`-Rpass` are
+ expansions). However, the locations used by `-Rpass` are
translated from debug annotations. That translation can be lossy,
which results in some remarks having no location information.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
