chandlerc added a comment. I'd like someone more active on the Clang side to comment about this, but here is my 2 cents...
It seems like it'd be nice to not populate or run or otherwise build up the legacy pass managers when using this option. I guess I would expect something to more split early between the two pipelines, and then merge back before doing codegen. I'm also somewhat hesitant with the '-middle-end-...' naming, but not sure what would work better. We don't have anything even comparable with the legacy PM, so maybe just "-llvm-custom-passes" or something similar? https://reviews.llvm.org/D21954 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
