oleg.smolsky marked 3 inline comments as done. oleg.smolsky added a comment.
Thanks for the quick review, Eugene! ================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:110 + + Checks for `return` statements with redundant parenthesis. + ---------------- Eugene.Zelenko wrote: > Please use double back-ticks for language constructs. Done. ================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/return-with-redundant-parens.rst:4 +readability-return-with-redundant-parens +========================= + ---------------- Eugene.Zelenko wrote: > Please make same length as check name. Done ================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/readability/return-with-redundant-parens.rst:6 + +Checks for `return` statements with redundant parenthesis. + ---------------- Eugene.Zelenko wrote: > Please use double back-ticks for language constructs. Done. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D131985/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D131985 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
