xbolva00 added a comment.
In D130894#3715124 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130894#3715124>, @mstorsjo wrote:
> This broke building with GCC (also noted by buildbot mails):
>
> ../tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp: In member function ‘void
> clang::Sema::DiagnoseStaticAssertDetails(const clang::Expr*)’:
> ../tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:16666:19: error: declaration of
> ‘const clang::Expr* clang::Sema::DiagnoseStaticAssertDetails(const
> clang::Expr*)::<unnamed struct>::Expr’ changes meaning of ‘Expr’
> [-fpermissive]
> 16666 | const Expr *Expr;
> | ^~~~
> In file included from ../tools/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h:22,
> from ../tools/clang/include/clang/AST/ASTLambda.h:18,
> from ../tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:15:
> ../tools/clang/include/clang/AST/Expr.h:109:7: note: ‘Expr’ declared here
> as ‘class clang::Expr’
> 109 | class Expr : public ValueStmt {
> | ^~~~
It is kinda bad that GCC throws an error and Clang does not even print a
warning.
How is it even possible? Clang does not implement strict(er) rules ?
@aaron.ballman
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130894/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D130894
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
