ShawnZhong added a comment. Thanks for the quick reply and the reference on the C standard!
On the C++ side, Section C.1.8 specified that `int` bit-fields are signed: > Change: Bit-fields of type plain int are signed. > Rationale: Leaving the choice of signedness to implementations could lead to > inconsistent definitions of template specializations. For consistency, the > implementation freedom was eliminated for non-dependent types, too. > Effect on original feature: The choise is implementation-defined in C, but > not so in C++. Implementation-wise, I'll see what I can find in CodeGen on whether `int` bit-fields are signed for C Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D131255/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D131255 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
