aaron.ballman added a comment. In D131057#3697265 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D131057#3697265>, @enh wrote:
>> I think making scanf in the same patch makes sense. Let me check existing >> tests... > > fwiw, most of the libcs seem to have been doing these separately because > scanf is harder. i hope to have bionic's scanf done this week though. > > (note in case you haven't already that there is no %B for scanf, just %b...) Whoops, you're right, that recommended practice I saw nearby was for fwprintf and not fscanf. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D131057/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D131057 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
