zixuw added a comment. Thanks Daniel!
================ Comment at: clang/test/ExtractAPI/availability.c:16 +//--- input.h +/// Documentation for a. +void a(void); ---------------- Do we care about doc comments for this particular test? The testing convention for all the ExtractAPI tests is probably not the most ideal one because every test is a complete matching of the full Symbol Graph output. So if we try to limit the scope of this test to just availability attributes it would be easier to read, and also avoid potential irrelevant failures in this test if something should broke the doc comment part. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D130918/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D130918 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
