kadircet added a comment. > Is my invocation correct or is this case handled by clangd and not clang?
yeah your invocation is correct. this is because clang's printer does a prefix based filtering (while clangd does a fuzzy match) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/lib/Sema/CodeCompleteConsumer.cpp#L623. ================ Comment at: clang/test/CodeCompletion/overrides.cpp:41 +// Runs completion at empty line on line 13. +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-patterns -code-completion-at=%s:13:1 %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-CC4 %s +// CHECK-CC4: COMPLETION: Pattern : void vfunc(bool param) override{{$}} ---------------- no need for `-code-completion-patterns`. can you also move the new test case below (after `CHECK-CC3-NOT`) that way we get to keep the line numbers for old tests the same. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D130363/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D130363 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
