ChuanqiXu added a comment. In D130689#3684333 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130689#3684333>, @thieta wrote:
> In D130689#3684330 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D130689#3684330>, @mehdi_amini > wrote: > >> What does it mean exactly? We can't use **anything** C++17 without writing >> it in the coding standards? >> I'm not sure it'll be manageable: how do you see this playing out? > > Probably poorly worded - what I was trying to convey is that if we want to > use a C++17 feature that's really impactful on the syntax/readability we > should probably consider recommending ways to use it in the coding standards, > similar to our guidelines on using for() loops > (https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#use-range-based-for-loops-wherever-possible) > or the auto keyword > (https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#use-auto-type-deduction-to-make-code-more-readable). So it is free that developers want to use some C++17 features in a small amount of code, right? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D130689/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D130689 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
