dblaikie added a comment. In D123319#3681884 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123319#3681884>, @Michael137 wrote:
> In D123319#3680169 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123319#3680169>, @aprantl wrote: > >> Sorry for the silence — I was out on vacation. >> >> @Michael137 has recently started looking into improving support for C++ >> lambdas in LLDB. >> Michael, would you be interested in taking a fresh look at this and figure >> out what the requirements for LLDB are here and how to answer the questions >> @dblaikie raised specifically? > > Sure will have a look at what's missing from https://reviews.llvm.org/D105564 > and whether these clang changes are indeed necessary Ah, the plan is to fix lldb and then revert this clang patch? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D123319/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D123319 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
