On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:35 AM, David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I believe so, but don't have specific numbers. Alexey made this choice > when it was originally implemented & I believe had the data back then. >
I don't think we made an explicit choice to use short names. gdb and addr2line just give you short names if you lack information about parameters, classes, and namespaces. I could be wrong though. -- we can't use -fline-tables-only 'cause they make stacks look very bad, >> > > Also I'm curious why your use case/tolerance for "badness" here is > different from what we've been using at Google for ASan, etc, for several > years now. Do you have different requirements/needs here? Then maybe we > need to figure out names for those needs & enshrine them in flags. > I don't think our requirements are that surprising: users should be able to take a stack dump with a standard stack dumping tool (gdb, addr2line, or chrome's breakpad crash server) and get usable symbols (names that include their scope). Anyway, we all agree it requires measurement. I was mostly trying to gauge interest, to see if this is a problem that other users are encountering. I'd forgotten about Nico's RFC for -gmlt, so yes, it sounds like there is interest in revisiting this tradeoff.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
