tahonermann added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp:2925-2926
   for (unsigned I = 0, E = readInt(); I != E; ++I)
-    Attrs.push_back(readAttr());
+    if (auto *Attr = readAttr())
+      Attrs.push_back(Attr);
 }
----------------
Interesting, this looks like a pre-existing issue. It looks like 
`readBTFTypeTagAttr()` in `clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTRecordReader.h` 
has an assumption that `readAttr()` always returns non-null. I wonder if that 
should be modified to use `cast_or_null` rather than `cast`. I don't see any 
need to address that issue (if it actually exists) in this review though.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp:4353
+  // https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56490 for example.
+  if (!A || (isa<PreferredNameAttr>(A) && Writer->isWritingNamedModules()))
     return Record.push_back(0);
----------------
ChuanqiXu wrote:
> The `Writer->isWritingNamedModules()` part is necessary. Otherwise we would 
> break the 
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/test/PCH/decl-attrs.cpp 
> test. The reason why the bug is not found by the user of PCH or clang modules 
> is that a header generally would be guarded by `#ifndef ... #define` fashion. 
> And if we remove the guard, the compiler would emit an error for duplicated 
> definition. So the problem only lives in C++20 Named Modules.
Correct me if I'm mistaken, but I think this issue only occurs because, in the 
test, both modules have the problematic declarations in the global module 
fragment; thus creating duplicate definitions that have to be merged which then 
exposes the ODR mismatch.

I'm suspicious that this actually fixes all possible scenarios. For example:
  //--- X1.cpp
  #include "foo.h"
  import A;

  //--- X2.cpp
  import A;
  #include "foo.h"

I would expect the proposed change to cause an ODR issue in these scenarios 
since the definition from the module still needs to be merged in non-modular 
TUs, but now the imported module will lack the attribute present in the 
non-modular TUs.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D130331/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D130331

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to