mizvekov added a comment. In D112374#3666531 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374#3666531>, @kimgr wrote:
> From a purely personal perspective, I'd prefer if this landed after the > branch for llvm-15. > > We try to co-release IWYU shortly after LLVM/Clang are released, to get a > public API-compatible release out there. So it would be really nice if we > didn't have to spend time working around AST changes while the clock is > ticking to get a release out the door. > > That said, I know we're just an out-of-tree project and the LLVM project as > such doesn't make any promises (and shouldn't have to!). I just thought I'd > raise the concern to see if anybody shares it. So I checked out and played a bit with IWYU sources yesterday. I saw that my previous suggestions only fixes one of the six test breakages. Yeah its a bit messy, I totally understand now why you seem a bit desperate about this haha. Since I am not one to met around in the torture business, I concur to hold. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
