hokein added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/pseudo/include/clang-pseudo/grammar/Grammar.h:172
+  //   terminal `,` becomes `comma`;
+  //   terminal `INT` becomes `int`;
+  std::string mangleSymbol(SymbolID) const;
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> I hope you mean kw_int? I'd like this to compile :-)
> 
> Can you also give the example for IDENTIFIER?
As discussed offline, we stick to the current version without `kw_` prefix. 
Added some comments for this decision.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/pseudo/lib/grammar/Grammar.cpp:48
 
+std::string Grammar::mangleSymbol(SymbolID SID) const {
+  static const char *const TokNames[] = {
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> I'm not sure exposing these from `Grammar` is an improvement, i think even in 
> principle we'd only want to use these for codegen.
> 
> The need for testing is real, but i guess you can add a test that uses the 
> CXX generated grammar, assert the elements of Rule::whatever, and the name of 
> Symbol::whatever?
Yeah, these functions are only used in the codegen. I'm inlined to the put it 
into the `Grammar`(it also has a `symbolName` definition, I'd prefer to have 
all naming functions in a single place). 


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D129359/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D129359

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to