arsenm added a comment. In D128907#3650750 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128907#3650750>, @jdoerfert wrote:
> That said, I doubt this is even what we want. Throwing away the benefits of > the noundef for one special case. IIRC, I mentioned alternatives in the other > discussion already,... not that I have a link handy. I've spent a while thinking about this and don't see a better option. It's one special case, but since that special case can be called from arbitrary user code, I don't see how we can preserve noundef. We can't specially treat the handful of special intrinsics/operands for this, since we would transitively need to apply this to any user code which calls those functions Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128907/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128907 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
