Author: Aaron Ballman Date: 2022-07-01T07:48:59-04:00 New Revision: 83fdf0c34e60e61849574d30c39cf7f7324c5271
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/83fdf0c34e60e61849574d30c39cf7f7324c5271 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/83fdf0c34e60e61849574d30c39cf7f7324c5271.diff LOG: Ensure that the generic associations aren't redundant This should hopefully address the test failure found in: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/171/builds/16833 Added: Modified: clang/test/C/drs/dr2xx.c Removed: ################################################################################ diff --git a/clang/test/C/drs/dr2xx.c b/clang/test/C/drs/dr2xx.c index 7cf692cb1a71..aa5fcff18f75 100644 --- a/clang/test/C/drs/dr2xx.c +++ b/clang/test/C/drs/dr2xx.c @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ void dr204(void) { * rank; it's acceptable to use an unsigned long or unsigned int for the size * type (those ranks are not greater than that of signed long). */ - (void)_Generic(s + sl, __typeof__(s) : 1, unsigned long : 1, unsigned int : 1); - (void)_Generic(p + sl, __typeof__(p) : 1, signed long : 1, signed int : 1); + (void)_Generic(s + sl, unsigned long long : 1, unsigned long : 1, unsigned int : 1); + (void)_Generic(p + sl, signed long long : 1, signed long : 1, signed int : 1); #elif __LLONG_WIDTH__ == __LONG_WIDTH__ /* But if the implementation doesn't support a larger standard integer type * than signed long, the conversion rank should prefer signed long if the type _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
