serge-sans-paille added a comment.
@aaron.ballman : I agree with most of your suggestion except the one below
that I annotated accordingly
struct Base {
virtual void O0();
private:
void II();
};
struct Derived : Base {
void OO(); // We should warn about this
void I1(); // I think we should warn about this too, because
implementation of, say, `O0` could refer to `I1` wich would be confusable with
`Il`
};
void I1(); // we should probably warn here too, becaus ein the implementation
of, says, `O0`, if we refer to `Il`, it's confusable with this `I1` too
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D128715/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D128715
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
