serge-sans-paille added a comment. GCC and Clang don't have the same behavior wrt. macros-as-abound and standard-layout-requirement, see https://godbolt.org/z/3vc4TcTYz I'm fine with keeping the CLang behavior, but do we want to keep it only for level=0, and drop it for higher level (this would look odd to me).
I'd say that we keep it for level 0,1,2, but then I think we should *not* make it an option of the `isFlexibleArrayMember` method. That would allow for inconsistent behavior wrt. FAM across the codebase and I'm not a fan of it. Thoughts? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
