ChuanqiXu added a comment. In D128328#3603940 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128328#3603940>, @iains wrote:
> In D128328#3602646 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128328#3602646>, @iains wrote: > >> In D128328#3601080 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128328#3601080>, @ChuanqiXu >> wrote: >> >>> It looks like we need to handle inline variable as well to match the >>> intention. >> >> can you construct a test-case, where this would apply and which is not >> already diagnosed as incorrect? > > Did you have some ideas here? The test may be something like: export module A; inline int a; module :private int a = 0; // expected-error But I feel like we couldn't go on before we get response from WG21. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128328/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128328 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
