vangthao added a comment. In D127923#3599451 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D127923#3599451>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> Is there a reason the remarks can't use individual diagnostic emissions to > simulate newlines? Or is this perhaps a demonstration that the remarks should > not be using the diagnostic engine at all and should be emitting their output > to a user-controllable stream (or file)? An issue with using multiple diagnostic emissions to simulate newlines is that there are repeated information such as diagnostic location and diagopts reprinted for each line. This creates a lot of noise and makes the output harder to read. Accepting newlines in diagnostics would allow for a lot more flexibility but I do see your point on how it would also encourage longer diagnostics. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D127923/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D127923 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
