alexfh added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tidy/modernize/DeprecatedHeadersCheck.cpp:99
@@ -88,3 +98,3 @@
   //
   // 1. Insert std prefix for every such symbol occurance.
   // 2. Insert `using namespace std;` to the beginning of TU.
----------------
nit: "occurrence"

================
Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-deprecated-headers.rst:45
@@ +44,3 @@
+
+These checks don't have effect in C++:
+
----------------
omtcyf0 wrote:
> At least that's what cppreference tells me.
> These checks don't have effect in C++:

Did you mean "headers"?

================
Comment at: test/clang-tidy/modernize-deprecated-headers-cxx03.cpp:34
@@ -31,22 +33,3 @@
 
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'assert.h'; consider using 'cassert' instead 
[modernize-deprecated-headers]
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'complex.h'; consider using 'ccomplex' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'ctype.h'; consider using 'cctype' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'errno.h'; consider using 'cerrno' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'float.h'; consider using 'cfloat' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'inttypes.h'; consider using 'cinttypes' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'iso646.h'; consider using 'ciso646' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'limits.h'; consider using 'climits' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'locale.h'; consider using 'clocale' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'math.h'; consider using 'cmath' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'setjmp.h'; consider using 'csetjmp' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'signal.h'; consider using 'csignal' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'stdarg.h'; consider using 'cstdarg' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'stddef.h'; consider using 'cstddef' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'stdint.h'; consider using 'cstdint' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'stdio.h'; consider using 'cstdio' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'stdlib.h'; consider using 'cstdlib' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'string.h'; consider using 'cstring' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'time.h'; consider using 'ctime' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'wchar.h'; consider using 'cwchar' instead
-// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-29]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'wctype.h'; consider using 'cwctype' instead
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-31]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'assert.h'; consider using 'cassert' instead 
[modernize-deprecated-headers]
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-31]]:10: warning: inclusion of deprecated C++ 
header 'complex.h'; consider using 'complex' instead
----------------
How about placing the check lines right after the corresponding includes? This 
way the test will be easier to read and won't require careful line offsets in 
the check lines.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D17990



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to