royjacobson added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:434 +- As per "Conditionally Trivial Special Member Functions" (P0848), it is + now possible to overload destructors using concepts. Note that the rest ---------------- erichkeane wrote: > Do we have enough to update cxx_status.html? I think it's still partial enough that I don't want to communicate 'maybe it will work'. I plan to finish the rest in time for Clang 15 so I prefer to just update it then :) But I don't feel very strongly about it either way. ================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h:1430 + /// out of which one will be selected at the end. + /// This is called separately from addedMember because it has to be deferred + /// to the completion of the class. ---------------- erichkeane wrote: > @aaron.ballman is messing around with addedMember recently... I wonder if > there are OTHER decisions that need to be updated/moved here? Do you know what papers/DRs he's working on? It seemed like most constexpr stuff is done per-function and not per-class. I don't think there's something else that needs to change but it's definitely possible I missed something.. I went through addedMember and tried to remove everything destructor related basically. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126194/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126194 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
