kees added a comment. In D126864#3584536 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864#3584536>, @serge-sans-paille wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836 does toward > `-fstrict-flex-arrays=<n>` with > > - `n=0` ⇒ `-fno-strict-flex-arrays`, current state (the default) > - `n=1` ⇒ only consider `[ 0]`, `[1}` and `[ ]` as flex array member > - `n=2` ⇒ only consider `[ 0]` and `[ ]` as flex array member > - `n=3` ⇒ only consider `[ ]` as flex array member > > I personnally like that approach, and I'd rather land that implementation. Sounds good to me! CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
