ksaunders added a comment. Two questions for Clang developers as I work on my next patches:
1. What is the Clang policy for warnings on extension usages? For example, this diff permits redeclaration of typedefs, which is a Plan 9 and Microsoft C extension. Earlier in the file this extension is enabled for Microsoft C as well, however no warning is emitted. In contrast, in Microsoft C if you use an anonymous embedded record in Clang a warning //is emitted// for extension usage. So it's unclear what should be a warning and what shouldn't be. 2. //MSVC Compatibility// has its own dedicated page on the Clang documentation site. Should I add a page for //Plan 9 Compatibility// which details the status of each feature now (and can be updated in subsequent diffs)? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D127462/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D127462 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
