kees added a comment. In D126864#3567647 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864#3567647>, @nickdesaulniers wrote:
> @kees maybe we should think about what would be needed for toolchains that > don't yet support `-fstrict-flex-arrays` in kernel sources? Does this become > a toolchain portability issue for older released toolchains we still intend > to support? Gaining this for the kernel is just to make sure all the trailing arrays are actually getting found and handled. The kernel will handle this fine either way. (It already has to treat UAPI 1-element array conversions very carefully...) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
