martong created this revision.
martong added a reviewer: steakhal.
Herald added subscribers: manas, ASDenysPetrov, gamesh411, dkrupp, donat.nagy, 
Szelethus, mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin, rnkovacs, szepet, baloghadamsoftware, 
xazax.hun.
Herald added a reviewer: Szelethus.
Herald added a project: All.
martong requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: clang.
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits.

Aligned with the measures we had in D124674 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124674>, 
this condition seems to be
unlikely.

Nevertheless, I've made some new measurments with stats just for this,
and data confirms this is indeed unlikely.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

https://reviews.llvm.org/D127190

Files:
  clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ConstraintManager.cpp


Index: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ConstraintManager.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ConstraintManager.cpp
+++ clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ConstraintManager.cpp
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
 ConstraintManager::ProgramStatePair
 ConstraintManager::assumeDualImpl(ProgramStateRef &State,
                                   AssumeFunction &Assume) {
-  if (State->isPosteriorlyOverconstrained())
+  if (LLVM_UNLIKELY(State->isPosteriorlyOverconstrained()))
     return {State, State};
 
   // Assume functions might recurse (see `reAssume` or `tryRearrange`). During


Index: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ConstraintManager.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ConstraintManager.cpp
+++ clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ConstraintManager.cpp
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
 ConstraintManager::ProgramStatePair
 ConstraintManager::assumeDualImpl(ProgramStateRef &State,
                                   AssumeFunction &Assume) {
-  if (State->isPosteriorlyOverconstrained())
+  if (LLVM_UNLIKELY(State->isPosteriorlyOverconstrained()))
     return {State, State};
 
   // Assume functions might recurse (see `reAssume` or `tryRearrange`). During
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to