carlo.bertolli added a comment.
I think that Kelvin is right. This is what that sentence refers to:
int * bla = ..;
#pragma omp target data use_device_ptr(bla)
{
.. bla .. // <-- this is the 'reference' that sentence is about
}
What puzzles me about that sentence is that it seems it is asking us to use bla
as following:
int addr_bla = &bla;
// now can use addr_bla
I am specifically referring to this part of the sentence: "must be to the
address of the list item"
Anyway, as Kelvin says, this has nothing to do with what we expect sema for
use_device_ptr to accept. Samuel point, but I may be mistaken, is that a
reference to a pointer should be considered as a pointer itself.
Alexey: if you do not think this is right, I can add a test that excludes
references.
Finally, thanks for the very quick review and for all your comments
- Carlo
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21904
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
