svenvh added a comment. In D126660#3550356 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126660#3550356>, @Anastasia wrote:
> Ok, makes sense! Thanks! > > Btw I was thinking we should provide some way for developers to know what > extensions are being supported either through documentation or by querying > clang somehow? I am guessing documentation would be easier to implement but > harder to keep in sync? I agree that would be nice to have. That would also enable us to distinguish valid pragmaless extensions from garbage (e.g. mistyped extensions), and would also help `-cl-ext` parsing/diagnosing for example. But that would require us to maintain a list of extensions inside Clang, which I believe is what we wanted to move away from (especially for extensions that only add library-like functionality)? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126660/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126660 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
