NoQ added a comment.

Looks awesome!

> add_new_check.py

I'm surprised it wasn't executable already, do we want to keep it?



================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/objc/CMakeLists.txt:13
   NSInvocationArgumentLifetimeCheck.cpp
+  NsdateformatterCheck.cpp
   ObjCTidyModule.cpp
----------------
Looks like everybody's respecting CaPiTaLiZaTiOn, I guess we could too?


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/objc/NsdateformatterCheck.cpp:22
+    // Adding matchers.
+    Finder->addMatcher(objcMessageExpr(hasSelector("setDateFormat:"), 
hasArgument(0, hasDescendant( stringLiteral().bind("str_lit")))), this);
+}
----------------
Please clang-format this down to 80 column limit 
(https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html).


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/list.rst:87
    `bugprone-reserved-identifier <bugprone-reserved-identifier.html>`_, "Yes"
-   `bugprone-shared-ptr-array-mismatch 
<bugprone-shared-ptr-array-mismatch.html>`_, "Yes"
    `bugprone-signal-handler <bugprone-signal-handler.html>`_,
----------------
Where did these go?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D126097/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D126097

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to