LegalizeAdulthood added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:180
+  the ``CheckHeaderFile=true`` option if header files of the project only
+  included by c++ source files.
 
----------------
Capitalize to `C++`


================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/modernize-deprecated-headers-extern-c.cpp:2-4
 // Copy the 'mylib.h' to a directory under the build directory. This is
 // required, since the relative order of the emitted diagnostics depends on the
 // absolute file paths which is sorted by clang-tidy prior emitting.
----------------
steakhal wrote:
> LegalizeAdulthood wrote:
> > IMO, all of this hackery is simply ducking the issue, which is that 
> > `check_clang_tidy.py` doesn't have proper support for validating fixits 
> > applied to header files.
> > 
> > See https://reviews.llvm.org/D17482
> I agree that this is nasty, but this was the only way I found to still test 
> the feature I'm about to introduce.
Agreed


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D125769/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D125769

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to