whisperity added a comment. In D125771#3519606 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D125771#3519606>, @LegalizeAdulthood wrote:
> I thought there wasn't any support for validating fixits applied to header > files? It is not specifically about the fixits, but diagnostics as a whole. It was not clear that if you say `-std=c++11-or-later` it will actually run **multiple** executions without giving you the ability to observe the contents of the files. Technically, you can always match a diagnostic that is positioned into a header from the TU that is producing that diagnostic, because `// CHECK-MESSAGES:` does a regular expression-like matching. For example, `misc-unused-parameters` does the following <http://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/dd12c3433ee9b4ef15c633bd325ab5a0c9c5e03b/clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/misc-unused-parameters.cpp>: #include "header.h" // CHECK-MESSAGES: header.h:1:38: warning And because LIT can execute arbitrary commands, you can always go about your way running `FileCheck` and everything else manually. But it is good to be reminded early on that `-or-later` will result in execution of potentially changed code outside of your (test file's) control. Saves the debugging time which we had to endure! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D125771/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D125771 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
