sammccall added a comment. The intent here is that `user-defined-string-literal-chunk := STRING_LITERAL` only matches when there's a ud-suffix. And `string-literal-chunk := STRING_LITERAL` only matches when there isn't. (e.g. with a rule guard, which we don't have implemented) If this was happening, would we still have the explosion?
I believe (once the guards are added) this patch will lead to rejecting "foo" "bar"_ud "baz". Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D125794/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D125794 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
