rjmccall added a comment.

I'm fine with alternatives on the names.  I just don't think we want names that 
imply that the caller and callee are parallel here, as if there were some sort 
of requirement that the callee always extends.  In those conventions, the 
callee gets passed 8 or 16 meaningful bits; if it wants an extended value, it's 
responsible for doing that extension, just like it would be responsible for 
doing the opposite extension if it wanted that.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D124435/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D124435

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to