jhuber6 added a comment. In D125165#3506172 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D125165#3506172>, @thakis wrote:
> We now have clang-offload-bundler, clang-offload-packager, > clang-offload-wrapper. Do we really need that many distinct binaries for > offloading? Any chance we could combine some of those? Yeah, it's not ideal. I would've liked to use `clang-offload-bundler` for this tool but we're keeping the old ones around for backwards compatibility. The `clang-offload-bundler` and `clang-offload-wrapper` have already been merged into `clang` and the `clang-linker-wrapper` respectively, they're kept around for backwards compatibility currently. I think HIP still uses the `clang-offload-bundler` but I'm in the process of changing that. I'm not sure if it's possible to delete these tools once they're introduced since someone might rely on the binary. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D125165/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D125165 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
