li.zhe.hua added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Transfer.cpp:38-41
+  if (auto *LHSValue =
+          dyn_cast_or_null<BoolValue>(Env.getValue(LHS, SkipPast::Reference)))
+    if (auto *RHSValue =
+            dyn_cast_or_null<BoolValue>(Env.getValue(RHS, 
SkipPast::Reference)))
----------------
ymandel wrote:
> Is the idea that the skipping is now built into `getValue` via 
> `getStorageLocation`?
I don't believe I fixed this. d002495 addressed this by having integral casts 
route to the sub-expression.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Transfer.cpp:545-561
+  void VisitParenExpr(const ParenExpr *S) {
+    // The CFG does not contain `ParenExpr` as top-level statements in basic
+    // blocks, however manual traversal to sub-expressions may encounter them.
+    // Redirect to the sub-expression.
+    auto *SubExpr = S->getSubExpr();
+    assert(SubExpr != nullptr);
+    Visit(SubExpr);
----------------
ymandel wrote:
> I thought this is the default behavior?
The default behavior of `StmtVisitor` is that `VisitFoo` will call 
`VisitFooBase` where `Foo` derives from `FooBase` (e.g. the default 
implementation of `VisitExprWithCleanups` calls `VisitFullExpr`). The base case 
is a `VisitStmt` implementation that does [approximately 
nothing](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/c2a5a87500d92c7c2e76c595f1b0f439b98b0aff/clang/include/clang/AST/StmtVisitor.h#L170-L171),
 especially if `RetTy = void`.

So in this case, I'm changing this to automatically ignore `ParenExpr` and 
`ExprWithCleanups` and visit the sub-expression, which is not the default 
behavior.

This isn't used when we call the transfer function from CFG-provided 
statements, because the CFG doesn't emit these nodes. However, this is relevant 
when we manually call the transfer function, e.g. from 
[here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/c2a5a87500d92c7c2e76c595f1b0f439b98b0aff/clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TypeErasedDataflowAnalysis.cpp#L108).


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D124965/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D124965

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to