xazax.hun added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-unchecked-optional-access.rst:29 + +Checking if a value exists, then accessing the value +---------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ymandel wrote: > xazax.hun wrote: > > I wonder if it would be easier to read if we had two top level categories, > > one for safe and one for unsafe accesses instead of switching back and > > forth between examples. > Sounds good, done. Let me know if that's what you had in mind. Yup, this is exactly what I had in mind, thanks! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D121120/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D121120 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
