yaxunl added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D21367#467982, @nhaustov wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D21367#467894, @yaxunl wrote: > > > I am wondering what's the difference between this calling convention and > > spir_kernel. > > > spir_kernel has only effect and was created only for SPIR target. In theory > it could perhaps be reused for AMDGPU target, however it seems not very clear > to me. If the new calling convention is to indicate a function is an OpenCL kernel, then it has exactly the same meaning as spir_kernel. Can we just use it in AMDGPU target? http://reviews.llvm.org/D21367 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
