aaron.ballman added a comment.
struct t {
int a, b, c, d, e;
} x = { .a = 2, 4, 5, 6 };
This situation seems like it should be an error, shouldn't it? The user
specified one designated initializer (yay, that one is correct), but the rest
are positional initializers and so there's no telling what they actually
initialize due to field randomization.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Sema/init-randomized-struct.c:1
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-unknown-linux
-frandomize-layout-seed=1234567890abcdef \
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-unknown-linux
-frandomize-layout-seed=1234567890abcded \
// RUN: -verify -fsyntax-only -Werror %s
----------------
Why is this change needed?
(Also, shouldn't there be other test coverage added to the file?)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D124694/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D124694
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
