sammccall marked 2 inline comments as done. sammccall added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/lib/WalkAST.cpp:18 +class ASTWalker : public RecursiveASTVisitor<ASTWalker> { + DeclCallback Callback; + ---------------- CJ-Johnson wrote: > Apologies for my ignorance of LLVM style. Should this be named with a > trailing underscore? And should it be a private field? no, LLVM members are named the same way as locals and classes. (Yes, it's awful). It is already a private field: members of classes are private by default (the difference between classes and structs). Google style requires private members to be after public ones (and thus `private:` is always present), but LLVM doesn't require this. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D124164/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D124164 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits