azharudd added a comment.

In D124474#3475550 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124474#3475550>, @beanz wrote:

> In D124474#3475539 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124474#3475539>, @azharudd 
> wrote:
>
>> In this case I'm just trying to make it work with existing build 
>> configurations where it is being used (for example Swift). We should 
>> definitely be moving away from `LLVM_BUILD_EXTERNAL_COMPILER_RT` in favor of 
>> `LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES` eventually though.
>
> My point here is that maybe you should move away from the legacy way of 
> building now rather than improving it... Not sure how @phosek feels about 
> this. I would personally very much prefer if we only had one way to build 
> compiler-rt instead of the half dozen we have today.

I understand, and I agree there should be only one way to do it. I did think 
about it but it is more involved and I unfortunately don't have the time to 
commit to it right now. I'm hoping we can take care of it at some point (I'm 
tracking it), but until then this satisfies the immediate need.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D124474/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D124474

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to