cor3ntin added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.h:534
+  /// Returns true if implicit int is supported at all.
+  bool implicitIntEnabled() const { return !CPlusPlus && !C2x; }
+
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
> This name seems inverse of what you mean to me?  IDK if you're 
> bike-shed-sniping me here, but:
> 
> `prohibitsImplicitInt` to be the reverse of above? It becomes SLIGHTLY 
> ambiguous to me (in that we don't mean "the language standard prohibits", we 
> mean "the compiler implementation prohibits"), but that can be fixed up with 
> a comment.
> 
> If you want to keep the direction, perhaps `implicitIntPermitted`, at which 
> point I might suggest the one above become `implicitIntRequired`.
@erichkeane `requiresImplicitInt` is only used twice. Does it needs a name?



================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:14329
       if (FTI.Params[i].Param == nullptr) {
-        SmallString<256> Code;
-        llvm::raw_svector_ostream(Code)
-            << "  int " << FTI.Params[i].Ident->getName() << ";\n";
-        Diag(FTI.Params[i].IdentLoc, diag::ext_param_not_declared)
-            << FTI.Params[i].Ident
-            << FixItHint::CreateInsertion(LocAfterDecls, Code);
+        if (getLangOpts().C99) {
+          SmallString<256> Code;
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
> IMO there should be a warning here for C89.  Warning for non-future-proof 
> code is pretty typical.
Isn't the counter argument that was made on similar changes that people 
specifically asking for C89 have peculiar expectations?
Otherwise i agree


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:14342-14343
         DeclSpec DS(attrs);
-        const char* PrevSpec; // unused
-        unsigned DiagID; // unused
+        const char *PrevSpec; // unused
+        unsigned DiagID;      // unused
         DS.SetTypeSpecType(DeclSpec::TST_int, FTI.Params[i].IdentLoc, PrevSpec,
----------------
Nitpick: whitespace only change


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D124258/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D124258

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to